Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marina Erakovic vs Rebecca Peterson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Erakovic vs Peterson analysis and find out who is favored!
Marina Erakovic vs Rebecca Peterson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Erakovic 1 - 0 Peterson
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Erakovic has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Peterson has won 48.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Erakovic, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Peterson has won 51.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 40.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Erakovic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peterson has saved 56.31% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Erakovic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Peterson winning 48.39% (W/L 15/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Erakovic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 72% (W/L 78/ 30), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 63/ 58). Peterson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 51/ 27), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 9/ 12).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Erakovic winning 1 times and Peterson being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Erakovic winning 2 and Peterson winning 0. The last match between Erakovic and Peterson was at the Wimbledon - London, 29-06-2017, Q2 round, Grass with Marina Erakovic getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Erakovic and Peterson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Erakovic winning 0 times and Peterson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Erakovic winning 0, and Peterson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Erakovic has played against opponents with an average rank of while Peterson has played against players with an average rank of 227.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Erakovic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peterson has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Erakovic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peterson has converted 56.36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
39
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
366
Rank
43
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
59% (351-248)
Career Total W/L
62% (361-222)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
59% (10-7)
$1,064,430
Career Prize Money
$1,646,921
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Marina Erakovic vs Rebecca Peterson For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Erakovic VS Peterson
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Marina Erakovic | Rebecca Peterson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:0 | 1:29:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (44/65) | 67% (48/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (37/44) | 60% (29/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (8/21) | 42% (10/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/7) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (33/72) | 31% (20/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Marina Erakovic
Player
Rebecca Peterson
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marina Erakovic | Rebecca Peterson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (10/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (21/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (186/154) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 51 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.4 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 67 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:33:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 239.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (685/1096) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (453/685) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (200/411) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 56% (62/110) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (487/1091) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (10/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (10/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (10/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (7/0) |
Marina Erakovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanie Voegele
Player
Marina Erakovic
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Marina Erakovic
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Anna Schmiedlova
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Grace Min
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sanaz Marand
Player
Marina Erakovic
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
46%
(
37 of
81)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
13
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Laura Robson
52%
(
47 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
6
Aces
9
13
Double Faults
10
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Marina Erakovic
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Erakovic
Player
Alla Kudryavtseva
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fanny Stollar
Player
Marina Erakovic
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rebecca Peterson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Rebecca Peterson
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rebecca Peterson
Player
Valeria Kravchenko
52%
(
15 of
29)
1st Serve %
43%
(
12 of
28)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
48
Total Points Won
9
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stephanie Wagner
Player
Rebecca Peterson
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Peterson
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Peterson
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julie Struplova
Player
Rebecca Peterson
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Peterson
Player
Joelle Steur
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
81%
(
35 of
43)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Rebecca Peterson
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Peterson
Player
Magali Kempen
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
7
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
10
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Peterson
Player
Alice Robbe
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Erakovic Vs Peterson Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Erakovic are available here and Peterson photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
